Design Research Methodology - Task 3: Research Design - Primary Data
Name: Yan Zhi Xuan
Student ID: 0369425
Research Problem
The study aims to explore the effectiveness, usability, and practical implications of biofeedback wearable devices for improving health and performance. It aims to bridge the gap between theoretical potential and practical use, focusing on the applicability of biofeedback technology in various fields and addressing the challenges and potential future paths in this rapidly developing industry.
Research Question(s)
- How does the use of biofeedback wearable devices affect performance and well-being across different user groups?
- What are users' perceptions and experiences regarding the usability and effectiveness of biofeedback wearable technologies?
- How can biofeedback technology be utilised to help individuals' well-being and manage stress?
Research Objective(s)
- To evaluate the effectiveness of biofeedback wearable devices in improving performance and well-being across different user groups.
- To identify the usability and user experience of various biofeedback wearable devices among everyday users.
- To explore the potential applications of biofeedback technology in enhancing well-being and managing stress in daily life.
Research Method and Design
Chosen Research Method: Survey
RO1: To evaluate the effectiveness of biofeedback wearable devices in improving performance and well-being across different user groups.
RO2: To identify the usability and user experience of various biofeedback wearable devices among everyday users.
RO3: To explore the potential applications of biofeedback technology in enhancing well-being and managing stress in daily life.
Description of the Chosen Method: Survey
The survey method is chosen to evaluate the effectiveness, usability, and user experience of biofeedback wearable devices among various user groups. Surveys are an effective technique to collect huge amounts of data from a wide population, providing quantitative and qualitative insights into the research problem. This strategy enables the collection of standardised data that can be statistically analysed to reveal patterns and relationships.
Survey research analyses a sample population to identify trends, attitudes, and views. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies utilising questionnaires or structured interviews aim to generalise findings from a sample to the entire population (Babbie, 1990). The survey will assess biofeedback wearable devices' effectiveness, user perceptions, practical implications, potential applications, and barriers to their adoption, focusing on performance, well-being, stress management, and daily life applications.
Justification of the Survey Method
Why the survey method is chosen for RO1, RO2 and RO3?
The survey method is well-suited for this research due to its efficient data collection, applicability in assessing subjective experiences, reliability and validity, supported by relevant literature. This method aims to gather data on user perceptions, experiences, and reported outcomes related to the use of biofeedback wearable devices.
Creswell and Creswell (2017) highlight the effectiveness of surveys in obtaining data from large populations quickly and economically, making them ideal for generalising findings across various user groups. Hence, the survey method can efficiently gather data from diverse user groups, allowing for comprehensive analysis of biofeedback wearable device experiences, including athletes and everyday users, in a short time. The method can also capture subjective experiences, perceptions, and usability of biofeedback wearable devices using closed-ended and open-ended questions, quantifying satisfaction and identifying challenges and needs.
Moreover, the survey method offers standardised data collection, enhancing reliability and comparability, which is crucial for evaluating the effectiveness and usability of biofeedback wearable devices across various user groups. According to Fowler (2014), standardised surveys ensure uniformity in data collection, which is necessary for making accurate comparisons across varied groups and reaching generalizable findings. Additionally, the method also offers a range of question forms, including Likert scales, multiple-choice questions, and open-ended questions, enabling the collection of both quantitative and qualitative data, and providing a comprehensive understanding of the study problem.
Description of the Sampling Procedure & Data Collection Instruments/ Tools
A. Online Survey Tool
The research's online survey will be conducted using Google Forms. Google Forms has an easy-to-use design, is compatible with a variety of devices, and integrates seamlessly with Google Sheets for data management and analytics. It allows users to create customised surveys with a variety of question types and gather data in real time.
B. Platform
The survey will employ Instagram to engage tech-savvy teenagers and young adults interested in health trends and wearable technology. Instagram's visual appeal and active user base make it ideal for capturing insights into their perceptions and usage of biofeedback wearables.
WhatsApp will target older adults and elders familiar with messaging apps, offering a direct and personalised approach to gathering data on their experiences with biofeedback devices. This platform's direct messaging and group features aim to uncover their perspectives and challenges in adopting such technologies.
By leveraging these platforms, the survey aims to gather comprehensive data across different age groups, providing insights into the effectiveness and usability of biofeedback wearables in diverse user demographics.
C. Participants
The survey seeks participants from diverse backgrounds who use biofeedback wearable devices: athletes for performance enhancement and health monitoring, office workers integrating devices for stress management and productivity, students employing them for academic and personal well-being, and the general public interested in health monitoring and overall well-being improvement through biofeedback technology. This approach aims to gather comprehensive insights into the effectiveness and usability of these devices across various demographics and lifestyles.
D. Pros and Cons
Instagram and WhatsApp offer targeted outreach to specific demographics, accessibility across devices, cost-effectiveness with Google Forms, real-time responses, and seamless data integration with Google Sheets for efficient data management and collaboration.
However, the research faces several challenges, including response bias, limited generalizability, privacy concerns, platform limitations, and technical issues. It may be skewed towards tech-savvy individuals, limiting the generalizability of findings to broader populations, and may face difficulties with mobile devices or internet connections.
Questionnaire Design
The questionnaire aims to gather comprehensive data on biofeedback wearable devices, including demographic information like age, gender, occupation, and education, to understand participant perspectives. Participants will be asked about their daily usage patterns of biofeedback wearables, frequency, and features, aiming to understand how these technologies are integrated into their daily routines. The study will evaluate the effectiveness of biofeedback wearables by examining participants' perceptions of their impact on physical performance, mental well-being, stress management, and overall health.
Besides that, the study will examine the challenges of biofeedback devices, such as usage issues, adoption barriers, and data privacy concerns, to identify potential obstacles to their widespread adoption. The evaluation will assess usability and user experience, focusing on ease of use, design satisfaction, data reliability, and overall user experience to identify areas for improvement. The questionnaire will also explore participants' expectations and desires for future biofeedback technology developments, including new applications, device features, and the health improvement potential of biofeedback wearables.
In summary, this online survey uses multiple-choice questions, check boxes and open-ended questions to gather comprehensive data on biofeedback wearable technology's current landscape, challenges, and future directions from user perspectives.
There are 4 sections with questions for each aspect:
Section 1: Demographic Information
Section 2: For Those Who Own A Smartwatch
Section 3: For Those Who Do Not Own A Smartwatch
Section 4: Future Potential
Google Form: https://forms.gle/vQus1AQdJxJqc9gB8
Research Topic: Enhancing Performance and Well-Being Through Biofeedback Wearable Devices
Introduction
Hi, I’m Zhi Xuan, a student of the Bachelor of Design (Hons) in Creative Design at Taylor’s University. As part of my research assignment (RES60604 Design Research Methodology), I am surveying to study the effectiveness, usability, and practical implications of biofeedback wearable devices like the smartwatch for improving health and performance. The survey aims to gather comprehensive data across different age groups, providing insights into the effectiveness and usability of biofeedback wearables in diverse user demographics.
Thank you for your valuable time and effort in completing this survey.
Figure 1: Biofeedback Wearable Devices
Section 1: Demographic Information
1.1 Age: What is your age?
Under 18
18-24
25-34
35-49
50-64
65+
1.2 Gender: What is your gender?
Male
Female
1.3 Occupation: What is your current occupation?
Student
Athlete
Office worker
General public
Other (please specify): [open text field]
1.4 Educational Background: What is your highest level of education completed?
High school or equivalent
Bachelor's degree
Master's degree
Doctorate or professional degree
Diploma
Foundation
Other (please specify): [open text field]
1.5 Device Ownership: Do you own a smartwatch?
Yes
No
If you own a smartwatch, please proceed to Section 3. If you do not own one, please skip to Section 4.
Section 2: For Those Who Own A Smartwatch
If you answered "Yes" to question 1.5, please answer the following questions:
2.1 Type of Biofeedback Wearable Device Used: Which type of smartwatch do you use?
Apple Watch
Fitbit Watch
Garmin Watch
Samsung Galaxy Watch
Other smartwatches (please specify the brand): [open text field]
2.2 Primary Purpose: For what primary purposes do you use your smartwatch? (Select all that apply)
Health monitoring (e.g., heart rate, sleep tracking)
Fitness tracking (e.g., steps, exercise)
Stress management
Performance enhancement (e.g., sports, work)
Mental well-being
Other (please specify): [open text field]
2.3 Frequency of Use: How often do you use your smartwatch?
Multiple times a day
Once a day
Few times a week
Occasionally
Rarely
2.4 Perceived Effectiveness: How effective do you find your smartwatch in improving your health and performance?
Not effective
Slightly effective
Moderately effective
Very effective
Extremely effective
2.5 Overall Health Impact: Overall, how has using your smartwatch impacted your health?
Very positively
Positively
No significant impact
Negatively
2.6 Usability: How easy is it to use your smartwatch?
Very easy
Easy
Neutral
Difficult
Very difficult
2.7 Satisfaction with Design and Functionality: How satisfied are you with the design and functionality of your smartwatch?
Very satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
2.8 Reliability of Data: How reliable do you find the data provided by your smartwatch?
Very reliable
Reliable
Neutral
Not very reliable
Unreliable
2.9 Difficulties Encountered: What difficulties have you encountered when using your smartwatch? (Select all that apply)
Technical issues
Comfort and fit
Data accuracy
Battery life
Other (please specify)
2.10 Overall User Experience: Overall, how would you rate your experience using your smartwatch?
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Please skip Section 3 and proceed to Section 4: Future Potential.
Section 3: For Those Who Do Not Own A Smartwatch
If you answered "No" to question 2.1, please answer the following questions:
3.1 Barriers to Adoption: What factors have prevented you from using a smartwatch? (Select all that apply)
Cost
Lack of trust in technology
Lack of awareness of benefits
Privacy concerns
Other (please specify)
3.2 Interest in Ownership: Are you interested in owning a smartwatch?
Yes
No
3.3 Familiarity with Technology: Are you familiar with smartwatch technology?
Yes
No
3.4 Potential Use Cases: If you were to own a smartwatch, what would be your primary purpose for using it? (Select all that apply)
Health monitoring (e.g., heart rate, sleep tracking)
Fitness tracking (e.g., steps, exercise)
Stress management
Performance enhancement (e.g., sports, work)
Mental well-being
Other (please specify): [open text field]
Please proceed to Section 4: Future Potential.
Section 4: Future Potential
4.1 Expectations for Future Developments:
What improvements or new features would you like to see in future biofeedback wearable devices other than smartwatches? (Open-ended)
4.2 New Applications:
In what new areas or applications do you envision biofeedback wearable devices other than smartwatches being used in the future? If you have no idea, you can just put "-". (Open-ended)
4.3 Desired Features:
What specific features or capabilities would make biofeedback wearable devices other than smartwatches more useful to you? If you have no idea, you can just put "-". (Open-ended)
Survey Distribution Process
First Distribution Time: July 4th, 2024 (Thursday)
Figure 2: Screenshots of WhatsApp messages released.
The survey was promoted through WhatsApp direct messages and group chat on July 4th, 2024 (Thursday).
Figure 3: Screenshots of Responses Summary of Google Sheets.
A total of 14 responses were collected on July 4th, 2024 (Thursday).
Second Distribution Time: July 5th, 2024 (Friday)
Figure 4: Screenshots of WhatsApp messages released.
The survey was promoted through a WhatsApp group chat on July 5th, 2024 (Friday).
Figure 5: Screenshots of Responses Summary of Google Sheets.
A total of 9 responses were collected on July 5th, 2024 (Friday), summing up to the total number of responses to 24 responses.
Third Distribution Time: July 6th, 2024 (Saturday)
Figure 6: Screenshots of Instagram Story and WhatsApp messages released.
The survey was promoted through the first Instagram story and WhatsApp direct messages and group chat on July 6th, 2024 (Saturday).
Figure 7: Screenshots of Responses Summary of Google Sheets.
A total of 40 responses were collected on July 6th, 2024 (Saturday), summing up to the total number of responses to 64 responses.
Fourth Distribution Time: July 7th, 2024 (Sunday)
Figure 8: Screenshots of Instagram Story and WhatsApp messages released.
The survey was promoted through the second Instagram story and WhatsApp group chats on July 7th, 2024 (Sunday).
Figure 9: Screenshots of Responses Summary of Google Sheets.
A total of 23 responses were collected on July 7th, 2024 (Sunday), summing up to the total number of responses to 86 responses.
Collected Data and Analysis of Data
Survey Results
Google Sheets responses summary report: Enhancing Performance and Well-Being Through Biofeedback Wearable Devices (Total responses: 86 responses)
The survey on "Enhancing Performance and Well-Being Through Biofeedback Wearable Devices" collected 86 responses, on the effectiveness, usability, and practical implications of biofeedback wearable devices like smartwatches for improving health and performance. The collected data provides insights into the effectiveness, usability and future potential of biofeedback wearables in diverse user demographics.
Section 1: Demographic Information
1.1 Age:
Figure 10.1: Pie Chart of Responders’ Age.
Based on the pie chart, it can be observed that the majority of respondents, 69 out of 86 (80.2%), were in the 18–24 age group. The 25-34 age group had 12 responses (14%). On the other hand, only two responses (3.5%) came from the 35–49 age group, indicating lower participation from middle-aged adults. Minimal engagement was seen from those under 18, with two responses (2.3%). There were no responses received from the 50-64 and 65+ age groups.
The data highlights a considerable age-related interest in biofeedback wearable devices, with young adults (18-24) comprising the majority at 80.2%. The high level of engagement is likely due to the fact that they are more tech-savvy and health-conscious. The 25-34 age group also shows considerable interest, with 14% of responses, indicating that young professionals find these devices beneficial for health and performance. The lower participation from the 35-49 age group (3.5%) suggests that more targeted marketing or educational efforts may be needed to engage middle-aged adults. Minimal engagement from those under 18 (2.3%) and no responses from those 50 and older highlight a lack of awareness or interest among these groups, pointing to opportunities for increased outreach and education.
In summary, the majority of interest in biofeedback wearables comes from young adults, with some engagement from young professionals. There is a clear need for targeted efforts to reach middle-aged and older adults to broaden the adoption of these devices.
1.2 Gender:
Figure 10.2: Pie Chart of Responders’ Gender.
Based on the pie chart, the majority of respondents were female, with 63 out of 86 responses (73.3%). Conversely, there were 23 male respondents, making up 26.7% of the total responses.
The data reveals a gender imbalance within the dataset. Nevertheless, this imbalance is unlikely to significantly affect the overall findings, as the study aims to capture a range of perspectives on biofeedback wearables like the smartwatch from both genders. The dominant female representation may lead to findings that largely reflect women's perceptions and opinions, while insights from male respondents could be comparatively limited due to their smaller representation.
In summary, there is a strong interest in biofeedback wearables among women, with a notable yet smaller interest from men, suggesting potential for targeted outreach to increase male engagement.
1.3 Occupation:
Figure 10.3: Pie Chart of Responders’ Occupation.
Based on the pie chart, the majority of respondents were students, with 63 out of 86 responses (77.9%). Office workers accounted for seven responses (8.1%), showing the next highest level of interest. The general public represented five responses (5.8%), while entrepreneurs and freelancers each had two responses (2.3%). Additionally, there was one response (1.2%) each from self-employed individuals, directors, and production managers.
The data indicates that students form the majority of respondents at 77.9%, reflecting a strong interest in biofeedback wearables among this group. Office workers follow with 8.1%, suggesting moderate interest among professionals seeking productivity and stress management tools. The general public's 5.8% representation shows some broader interest, while entrepreneurs and freelancers each at 2.3%, demonstrate niche interest. Minimal engagement from self-employed individuals, directors, and production managers at 1.2% each highlights very low interest among these groups.
In summary, the survey shows strong interest in biofeedback wearables from students, with moderate interest from office workers and the general public. Entrepreneurs and freelancers show niche engagement, while directors and production managers display minimal involvement, suggesting opportunities for targeted outreach to these lesser-engaged groups.
1.4 Educational Background:
Figure 10.4: Pie Chart of Responders’ Educational Background.
Based on the pie chart, the majority of respondents, 45 out of 86 (52.3%), have completed high school or an equivalent level of education. There were 33 responses (38.4%) from individuals with a bachelor's degree. Both the master's degree and foundation categories had three responses each (3.5%). Furthermore, there were two responses (2.3%) from individuals with a diploma.
The data reveals that the majority of respondents, 52.3%, have completed high school, suggesting significant interest in biofeedback wearables among younger individuals. Substantial engagement is also seen in respondents with a bachelor's degree, making up 38.4% of the participants. This indicates that people with higher education levels are also keen on using these devices. The smaller segments, with 3.5% each for master's degree and foundation education and 2.3% for diploma holders, show that while there is some interest from these educational groups, they form a smaller part of the overall participants.
In summary, the data reveals that the majority of respondents have completed high school or a bachelor's degree, indicating a strong interest in biofeedback wearables among these education levels. There is some interest from those with master's degrees, foundation education, and diplomas, but they form a smaller segment of the participants.
1.5 Device Ownership:
Figure 10.5: Pie Chart of Responders’ Device Ownership.
Based on the pie chart, out of the 86 respondents, 56 (65.1%) own a smartwatch. In contrast, 30 respondents (34.9%) do not own a smartwatch.
The data shows that most respondents, 65.1%, own a smartwatch, reflecting widespread usage and familiarity with biofeedback wearable technology. This high ownership rate suggests that many participants are integrating these devices into their daily routines for health and performance monitoring. Conversely, the 34.9% of respondents who do not own a smartwatch highlight a substantial group that has not adopted this technology. This indicates potential barriers to smartwatch ownership, such as cost, perceived usefulness, or lack of awareness.
In summary, the data reveals that while a majority of respondents own smartwatches, a considerable minority do not, pointing to opportunities for increasing adoption by addressing potential barriers and expanding the reach of biofeedback wearable technology.
Section 2: For Those Who Own A Smartwatch
2.1 Type of Biofeedback Wearable Device Used:
Figure 10.6: Pie Chart of the Type of Smartwatches Used by Responders Who Own Smartwatches.
Based on the pie chart, among the 56 respondents, the majority, 39 (69.6%), own an Apple Watch. Nine respondents (16.1%) own a Samsung Galaxy Watch, making it the second most popular choice. Additionally, three respondents (5.4%) own a Garmin Watch. Each of the following smartwatches is owned by one respondent (1.8% each): Fitbit Watch, Fossil Gen 5 Garrett Watch, another Garmin Smartwatch, Oppo Watch, and Xiaomi Watch. These individual cases reflect the diversity in brand preferences, though they are less common among the participants.
The data reveals that the Apple Watch is the dominant choice among smartwatch owners, with 69.6% of respondents preferring it for its biofeedback and health monitoring features. The Samsung Galaxy Watch follows at 16.1%, showing it is also popular among users. Garmin Watches have a smaller yet notable presence at 5.4%, indicating that some users value their fitness and outdoor tracking capabilities. The presence of Fitbit, Fossil, Oppo, and Xiaomi watches, each at 1.8%, highlights the diversity in brand preferences, even if these brands are less common among the participants.
In summary, the Apple Watch dominates among smartwatch owners in the survey, followed by the Samsung Galaxy Watch. Garmin Watch has a smaller yet notable presence. At the same time, other brands like Fitbit, Fossil, Oppo, and Xiaomi are represented by individual users, showcasing a variety of preferences in biofeedback wearable technology.
2.2 Primary Purpose:
Figure 10.7: Horizontal Bar Chart of Primary Purpose with Smartwatches by Responders Who Own One.
The horizontal bar chart illustrates the primary purposes for which 56 respondents, who own a smartwatch, use their devices. The breakdown is as follows: health monitoring (47 respondents, 83.9%), fitness tracking (46 respondents, 82.1%), stress management (17 respondents, 30.4%), performance enhancement (21 respondents, 37.5%), mental well-being (11 respondents, 19.6%), health condition management (eight respondents, 14.3%), fashion accessories (one respondent, 1.8%), work (one respondent, 1.8%), and checking messages (one respondent, 1.8%).
The data indicates that the most common uses for smartwatches among owners are health monitoring and fitness tracking, with 83.9% and 82.1% of respondents, respectively, utilising their devices for these purposes. This highlights the importance of these features in maintaining and improving health and fitness. Performance enhancement is also a significant use, with 37.5% of respondents leveraging their smartwatches to optimise their physical activities. Stress management is noted by 30.4% of respondents, reflecting the growing awareness of mental health and the role of technology in managing stress. Mental well-being and health condition management are also notable uses, cited by 19.6% and 14.3% of respondents, respectively. The chart also shows that a small number of respondents use their smartwatches for fashion accessories, work, and checking messages, indicating the versatility of these devices.
In summary, the primary uses of smartwatches among respondents are for health monitoring and fitness tracking, followed by performance enhancement and stress management. There is also notable interest in mental well-being and health condition management, with a few using their devices for other specialised purposes, demonstrating the multifunctional nature of smartwatches.
2.3 Frequency of Use:
Figure 10.8: Pie Chart of Frequency of Use with Smartwatches by Responders Who Own One.
The pie chart illustrates the frequency of smartwatch usage among 56 respondents who own a smartwatch. The breakdown is as follows: 18 respondents (32.1%) use their smartwatches multiple times a day, 12 respondents (21.4%) use them once a day, 12 respondents (21.4%) use them a few times a week, 12 respondents (21.4%) use them occasionally, and two respondents (3.6%) rarely use their smartwatches.
The data shows that a significant portion of smartwatch owners, 32.1%, use their devices multiple times a day, indicating a high level of reliance and integration into daily routines. An equal number of respondents, 21.4%, use their smartwatches either once a day, a few times a week, or occasionally, reflecting varied usage patterns based on individual needs and preferences. Only 3.6% of respondents rarely use their smartwatches, suggesting that while most users find frequent or regular value in their devices, a small minority do not engage with them as often.
In summary, the majority of smartwatch owners use their devices regularly, with a notable proportion using them multiple times daily. This highlights the importance of smartwatches in the daily lives of users, though there is still a small segment that uses them less frequently.
2.4 Perceived Effectiveness:
Figure 10.9: Pie Chart of Perceived Effectiveness with Smartwatches by Responders Who Own One.
The pie chart shows the effectiveness of smartwatches in improving health and performance among 56 respondents who own smartwatches. The responses are distributed as follows: 20 respondents (35.7%) find their smartwatches slightly effective, 13 respondents (23.2%) find them moderately effective, 10 respondents (17.9%) find them extremely effective, nine respondents (16.1%) find them very effective, and four respondents (7.1%) find them not effective.
The data shows a varied perception of the effectiveness of smartwatches in improving health and performance. The largest group, 35.7%, finds their smartwatches slightly effective, indicating that while there is some benefit, it may not be substantial. A significant portion, 23.2%, finds them moderately effective, suggesting that these users see a reasonable improvement in their health and performance. Meanwhile, 16.1% and 17.9% of respondents find their smartwatches very effective and extremely effective, respectively, highlighting a smaller group that experiences considerable benefits. Lastly, 7.1% of respondents find their smartwatches not effective, indicating that for a minority, the devices do not provide noticeable health or performance improvements.
In summary, while a majority of respondents find some level of effectiveness in using their smartwatches, ranging from slight to extreme, there remains a small percentage who do not perceive any benefits. This suggests opportunities for enhancing the features and user experience of smartwatches to better meet the needs of all users.
2.5 Overall Health Impact:
Figure 10.10: Pie Chart of Overall Health Impact with Smartwatches by Responders Who Own One.
The pie chart illustrates the overall impact of using smartwatches on health among 56 respondents. The results are distributed as follows: 34 respondents (60.7%) reported a positive impact, 11 respondents (19.6%) reported a very positive impact, 11 respondents (19.6%) reported no significant impact, and zero respondents reported a negative impact.
The data indicates that the majority of respondents perceive a positive impact on their health from using smartwatches, with 60.7% reporting a positive impact and 19.6% reporting a very positive impact. This suggests that most users find their smartwatches beneficial for health improvement. Additionally, 19.6% of respondents reported no significant impact, indicating that while smartwatches are beneficial for many, they do not make a noticeable difference for some users. Notably, no respondents reported a negative impact, highlighting that smartwatches are generally well-received and considered safe and beneficial for health monitoring.
In summary, the majority of respondents experience positive health benefits from using their smartwatches, with a smaller segment finding no significant impact and no negative reports, underscoring the overall positive reception and effectiveness of these devices.
2.6 Usability:
Figure 10.11: Pie Chart of Usability with Smartwatches by Responders Who Own One. Based on the pie chart, among the 56 respondents,
The pie chart illustrates the ease of use of smartwatches among 56 respondents. The results are distributed as follows: 32 respondents (57.1%) find it easy to use their smartwatch, 18 respondents (32.1%) find it very easy, five respondents (8.9%) are neutral, one respondent (1.8%) find it difficult, and zero respondents finds it very difficult.
The data indicates that the majority of respondents, 89.2%, find their smartwatches easy or very easy to use, reflecting a generally positive user experience with these devices. A small portion, 8.9%, is neutral, suggesting that while these users do not find the devices difficult to use, they are not exceptionally easy either. Only 1.8% of respondents find their smartwatches difficult to use, and none find them very difficult, indicating that user-friendliness is a strong point of smartwatches.
In summary, the majority of respondents find their smartwatches easy to use, with very few experiencing difficulties, highlighting the effectiveness of these devices in providing a user-friendly experience.
2.7 Satisfaction with Design and Functionality:
Figure 10.12: Pie Chart of Satisfaction with Design and Functionality of Smartwatches by Responders Who Own One.
The pie chart illustrates the satisfaction levels with the design and functionality of smartwatches among 56 respondents. The breakdown is as follows: 33 respondents (58.9%) are satisfied, 11 respondents (19.6%) are very satisfied, 10 respondents (17.9%) are neutral, two respondents (3.6%) are dissatisfied, and zero respondents are very dissatisfied.
The data indicates that a significant majority of respondents, 78.5%, are either satisfied or very satisfied with the design and functionality of their smartwatches. This suggests that most users find their smartwatches meet their expectations in terms of design and usability. A smaller portion, 17.9%, is neutral, indicating that these users find the devices neither particularly impressive nor disappointing. Only 3.6% of respondents are dissatisfied, and none are very dissatisfied, highlighting that dissatisfaction with smartwatch design and functionality is minimal.
In summary, the majority of respondents are pleased with the design and functionality of their smartwatches, with very few expressing dissatisfaction. This indicates a generally positive user experience and satisfaction with these devices.
2.8 Reliability of Data:
Figure 10.13: Pie Chart of Reliability of Data with Smartwatches by Responders Who Own One.
The pie chart illustrates the perceived reliability of data provided by smartwatches among 56 respondents. The breakdown is as follows: 40 respondents (71.4%) find the data reliable, 14 respondents (25%) are neutral, two respondents (3.6%) find the data very reliable, and no respondents find the data not very reliable or unreliable.
The data indicates that a majority of respondents, 75%, find the data from their smartwatches either reliable or very reliable. This suggests a high level of trust in the accuracy of the information provided by these devices. A significant portion, 25%, remains neutral, indicating that while they do not doubt the data, they are not particularly convinced of its reliability either. Importantly, no respondents find the data not very reliable or unreliable, underscoring a general confidence in the performance of smartwatches.
In summary, the majority of respondents trust the data provided by their smartwatches, with a significant portion expressing neutrality and none expressing distrust, highlighting the overall reliability and credibility of these devices.
2.9 Difficulties Encountered:
Figure 10.14: Horizontal Bar Chart of Difficulties Encountered with Smartwatches by Responders Who Own One.
The horizontal bar chart illustrates the difficulties encountered by 56 respondents when using their smartwatches. The issues reported are as follows: battery life (27 respondents, 48.2%), data accuracy (21 respondents, 37.5%), comfort and fit (17 respondents, 30.4%), technical issues (16 respondents, 28.6%), lagging (one respondent, 1.8%), and an unspecified issue noted as "You let me know next time" (one respondent, 1.8%).
The data reveals that the most common difficulty faced by smartwatch users is battery life, with 48.2% of respondents indicating this as an issue. This suggests that many users find the battery life of their smartwatches insufficient for their needs. Data accuracy is the next most significant concern, reported by 37.5% of respondents, highlighting potential reliability issues that could affect the user experience. Comfort and fit are also notable problems, with 30.4% of users experiencing discomfort while wearing their smartwatches. Technical issues, such as software or hardware malfunctions, affect 28.6% of respondents, indicating room for improvement in the overall functionality of these devices. Additionally, a small number of users reported issues with lagging (1.8%) and an unspecified concern (1.8%).
In summary, while smartwatches are generally well-received, there are notable areas for improvement, particularly in battery life, data accuracy, and comfort. Addressing these issues could enhance user satisfaction and broaden the appeal of these devices.
2.10 Overall User Experience:
Figure 10.15: Pie Chart of Overall User Experience with Smartwatches by Responders Who Own One.
The pie chart illustrates the overall user experience ratings of smartwatches among 56 respondents. The breakdown is as follows: 39 respondents (69.6%) rated their experience as good, 13 respondents (23.2%) rated it as excellent, four respondents (7.1%) rated it as fair, and zero respondents rated it as poor.
The data indicates that the majority of respondents have a positive overall experience using their smartwatches, with 69.6% rating their experience as good and 23.2% rating it as excellent. This suggests a high level of satisfaction among users, indicating that smartwatches are generally well-received. A smaller portion, 7.1%, rated their experience as fair, suggesting that while these users find the devices acceptable, there is room for improvement. Notably, no respondents rated their experience as poor, highlighting that very few users have significant issues with their smartwatches.
In summary, the majority of respondents have a positive experience with their smartwatches, with most rating their experience as good or excellent. This indicates a high level of user satisfaction and suggests that smartwatches are effective in meeting user expectations.
Section 3: For Those Who Do Not Own A Smartwatch
3.1 Barriers to Adoption:
Figure 10.16: Horizontal Bar Chart of Barriers to Adoption of Smartwatches by Responders Who Do Not Own One.
The horizontal bar chart illustrates the factors that have prevented 30 respondents, who do not own a smartwatch, from using one. The reported barriers are as follows: cost (23 respondents, 76.7%), lack of awareness of benefits (10 respondents, 33.3%), lack of trust in technology (four respondents, 13.3%), privacy concerns (four respondents, 13.3%), and battery life issues or being troublesome (one respondent, 3.3%).
The data indicates that the most significant barrier to smartwatch adoption is cost, with 76.7% of respondents citing it as a prohibitive factor. This suggests that the high price of smartwatches is a major deterrent for potential users. Lack of awareness of the benefits is the second most cited factor, affecting 33.3% of respondents, indicating a need for better education and communication about the advantages of using smartwatches. Both lack of trust in technology and privacy concerns are reported by 13.3% of respondents, highlighting issues with trust and data security that might be preventing adoption. Battery life issues or being troublesome is a minor concern, reported by only 3.3% of respondents.
In summary, the primary barriers to smartwatch adoption among non-users are cost and lack of awareness of benefits, followed by concerns about technology trust and privacy. Addressing these issues through cost reduction, better education, and enhanced security measures could help increase adoption rates.
3.2 Interest in Ownership:
Figure 10.17: Pie Chart of Interest in Ownership of Smartwatches by Responders Who Do Not Own One.
The pie chart illustrates the interest in owning a smartwatch among 30 respondents who currently do not own one. The breakdown is as follows: 19 respondents (63.3%) are not interested in owning a smartwatch, while 11 respondents (36.7%) are interested.
The data indicates that the majority of respondents, 63.3%, are not interested in owning a smartwatch. This suggests a significant lack of interest among non-users, which could be due to various factors such as perceived lack of need, satisfaction with current devices, or previously mentioned barriers like cost and privacy concerns. On the other hand, 36.7% of respondents show interest in owning a smartwatch, indicating a potential market segment that could be targeted with the right incentives and information about the benefits of smartwatches.
In summary, while a majority of non-users are currently not interested in owning a smartwatch, a considerable portion remains open to the idea, suggesting opportunities for targeted marketing and education to convert this interest into adoption.
3.3 Familiarity with Technology:
Figure 10.18: Pie Chart of Familiarity with Technology of Smartwatches by Responders Who Do Not Own One.
The pie chart illustrates the familiarity with smartwatch technology among 30 respondents who do not own a smartwatch. The breakdown is as follows: 29 respondents (96.7%) are not familiar with smartwatch technology, while one respondent (3.3%) is familiar.
The data indicates that an overwhelming majority of respondents, 96.7%, are not familiar with smartwatch technology. This lack of familiarity could be a significant barrier to adoption, as potential users may not understand the benefits or functionalities of smartwatches. The minimal familiarity among non-users suggests a need for increased awareness and education about what smartwatches can offer. Only 3.3% of respondents are familiar with the technology, highlighting a small segment that could be more easily persuaded to adopt smartwatches with the right information and incentives.
In summary, there is a substantial lack of familiarity with smartwatch technology among non-users, which presents a significant barrier to adoption. Targeted educational initiatives and awareness campaigns could help bridge this knowledge gap and potentially increase interest in owning smartwatches.
3.4 Potential Use Cases:
Figure 10.19: Horizontal Bar Chart of Potential Use Cases of Smartwatches by Responders Who Do Not Own One.
The horizontal bar chart illustrates the primary purposes for which 30 respondents, who do not own a smartwatch, would use one if they were to own it. The breakdown of their preferred uses is as follows: fitness tracking (22 respondents, 73.3%), health monitoring (21 respondents, 70%), stress management (10 respondents, 33.3%), mental well-being (eight respondents, 26.7%), performance enhancement (six respondents, 20%), and health condition management (five respondents, 16.7%). One respondent (3.3%) mentioned an unspecified health condition management purpose.
The data indicates that the most popular potential uses for smartwatches among non-owners are fitness tracking and health monitoring, with 73.3% and 70% of respondents, respectively, citing these as primary purposes. This suggests a strong interest in using smartwatches for maintaining and improving physical health. Stress management is also a significant potential use, with 33.3% of respondents indicating it as a primary purpose, reflecting the growing importance of mental health support. Mental well-being and performance enhancement are notable for 26.7% and 20% of respondents, respectively, indicating that a substantial number of potential users see value in these aspects. Health condition management, though less commonly cited (16.7%), still represents a critical use for some respondents.
In summary, non-owners are primarily interested in using smartwatches for fitness tracking and health monitoring, with significant interest in stress management, mental well-being, and performance enhancement. These insights suggest that promoting these key benefits could help attract new users to smartwatch technology.
Section 4: Future Potential
4.1 Expectations for Future Developments:
Figure 10.20: Answers of Expectations for Future Developments of Smartwatches by Responders.
The open-ended responses provide a variety of suggestions for improvements or new features in future biofeedback wearable devices other than smartwatches. Out of 86 responses, several themes and specific ideas emerged, indicating the desired enhancements users would like to see.
The most frequently mentioned improvement is extending battery life, with multiple respondents emphasising the need for longer-lasting power to reduce the frequency of recharging. Other common suggestions include better design and comfort, such as slimmer and more ergonomic designs for ease of wear during activities like sports. Enhanced accuracy and sensitivity of sensors are also important to users, with calls for improved precision in tracking physiological parameters like heart rate, blood pressure, and other health metrics.
Moreover, several respondents expressed a desire for real-time, personalised coaching and feedback based on physiological data, integrating AI and machine learning to provide more tailored recommendations. Affordability and cost-effectiveness were also highlighted, indicating that users are looking for more budget-friendly options without compromising on quality.
Besides that, additional specific features mentioned include solar or kinetic motion-powered devices, hologram functions, blood pressure measurement, reminders to drink water, and integration with Google Maps and music apps. Some users suggested innovative ideas like incorporating virtual pets for enhanced user engagement and automatically sending emergency messages during abnormal situations.
In summary, the key areas for improvement in future biofeedback wearable devices are battery life, design and comfort, accuracy and sensitivity of sensors, real-time personalised feedback, and affordability. Incorporating these enhancements could significantly increase user satisfaction and broaden the appeal of biofeedback wearables.
4.2 New Applications:
Figure 10.21: Answers of New Applications of Smartwatches by Responders.
The open-ended responses provide various suggestions for new areas or applications where biofeedback wearable devices, other than smartwatches, could be used in the future. Out of 86 responses, several themes and specific ideas emerged, indicating potential future uses.
A common theme among the responses is the application of biofeedback wearables in mental health management. Respondents envision these devices helping users monitor and manage stress, anxiety, and depression through real-time data and personalized interventions. This indicates a growing awareness and need for mental health support using technology.
Another significant area mentioned is healthcare, where biofeedback wearables could be used for patient monitoring in hospitals, early detection of health problems, and improving patient engagement. These devices could provide continuous monitoring of vital signs and other health metrics, enhancing the quality of care.
Besides that, the potential use of biofeedback wearables in rehabilitation for the elderly or physically challenged was also highlighted, suggesting their application in improving mobility, monitoring recovery, and ensuring safety. Similarly, applications in sports performance optimisation, injury prevention, and fitness training were mentioned, indicating a role in enhancing athletic performance and recovery.
Furthermore, additional areas of interest include VR integration, military use, education, manufacturing factory workers, and personalised nutrition management. Respondents also suggested innovative applications such as simultaneous translation, emergency rescue, agriculture, and even using these devices as remote controls or for video calls.
In summary, respondents envision biofeedback wearable devices being used in various new areas, with a strong focus on mental health management, healthcare, and rehabilitation. These insights suggest a broad potential for these devices to enhance well-being, improve medical care, and support diverse applications beyond traditional uses.
4.3 Desired Features:
Figure 10.22: Answers of Desired Features of Smartwatches by Responders.
The open-ended responses provide various suggestions for specific features or capabilities that would make biofeedback wearable devices, other than smartwatches, more useful. Out of 101 responses, several themes and specific ideas emerged.
A common theme among the responses is the desire for advanced AI and personalised feedback. Respondents expressed interest in features such as real-time AI language translation, personalised health insights, and adaptive feedback based on physiological data. This suggests a need for biofeedback wearables to be more intelligent and tailored to individual users.
Besides that, Another significant area of interest is battery life, with many respondents emphasising the need for longer battery performance and faster charging. This indicates that battery life remains a critical concern for users, affecting the usability and convenience of biofeedback wearables.
Additionally, respondents mentioned the importance of accurate data tracking and monitoring for various health metrics, including heart rate, blood pressure, sleep, and menstrual cycles. This highlights the demand for reliable and comprehensive health-tracking features.
Furthermore, other specific features suggested include built-in navigational systems, emergency call capabilities, GPS directions, and reminders for activities such as drinking water and exercising. Some respondents also expressed interest in integrating entertainment features like music and games, indicating a desire for multi-functional devices.
In summary, the key features and capabilities that would make biofeedback wearable devices more useful include advanced AI and personalised feedback, longer battery life, accurate data tracking, built-in navigation and emergency functions, and the integration of entertainment features. These enhancements could significantly improve user satisfaction and broaden the appeal of biofeedback wearables.
Primary Data Collection Conclusion
Based on the primary data collected from 86 respondents, several key findings address the research questions and objectives.
Firstly, the data reveals that biofeedback wearable devices, particularly smartwatches, are widely used for health monitoring (83.9%) and fitness tracking (82.1%). A majority of users report positive impacts on their health and performance, with 69.6% rating their experience as good and 23.2% as excellent. This suggests that these devices are effective tools for enhancing physical health and overall well-being across different user groups.
In terms of usability and user experience, biofeedback wearables are generally well-received. The data indicates that 89.2% of respondents find their smartwatches easy or very easy to use, and 78.5% express satisfaction with their design and functionality. However, notable areas for improvement include battery life, identified as a significant issue by 48.2% of users, and data accuracy, which 37.5% of respondents cited as a concern. Enhancing these aspects could further improve user satisfaction and the overall effectiveness of these devices.
The potential applications of biofeedback wearables in mental health management are particularly promising. There is strong interest among respondents in using these devices for stress monitoring, anxiety management, and personalised health insights. This aligns with the finding that 30.4% of users already utilise their devices for stress management. Expanding the functionality of biofeedback wearables to better support mental health and well-being through features such as real-time feedback, AI-driven insights, and personalised coaching presents a significant opportunity.
For non-users, the primary barriers to adoption include cost (76.7%) and lack of awareness of benefits (33.3%). Addressing these barriers through more affordable options and better education on the advantages of biofeedback wearables could increase adoption rates. It is essential to communicate the value and benefits of these devices more effectively to potential users.
In conclusion, the primary data collected supports the effectiveness of biofeedback wearable devices in improving performance and well-being, particularly through health monitoring and fitness tracking. While users generally find these devices usable and satisfactory, there are opportunities for improvement in battery life and data accuracy. The potential for biofeedback wearables to support mental health applications is significant, offering personalised and real-time support for stress and anxiety management. By addressing cost and awareness barriers, the adoption and utilisation of biofeedback wearables can be broadened, enhancing individual well-being across different user groups.
Reference List
Ahram, T. & Falcão, C. (2020). Advances in usability, user experience, wearable and
assistive technology. Springer.
Alhejaili, R. & Alomainy, A. (2023). The use of wearable technology in providing
assistive solutions for mental well-being. Sensors 2023, 23(17), 7378.
https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/17/7378
Babbie, E. (1990) Survey research methods (2nd ed.). Wadsworth.
https://scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1234052
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and
mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.php/510378/mod_resource/content/1/creswell.pdf
Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey research methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
https://books.google.com.my/books/about/Survey_Research_Methods.html?id=GcKhAQAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Peake, J.M., Kerr, G. & Sullivan, S.P. (2018). A critical review of consumer wearables,
mobile applications, and equipment for providing biofeedback, monitoring stress, and sleep in physically active populations. Frontiers in Physiology. Exercise Physiology, 9.
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2018.00743/full
Son, C., Hegde, S., Markert, C., Zahed, K. & Sasangohar, F. (2023). Use of a mobile
biofeedback app to provide health coaching for stress self-management: Pilot quasi-experiment. JMIR Formative Research 2023, 7, e41018.
https://formative.jmir.org/2023/1/e41018/
Wu, J.Y., Ching, C.T.S., Wang, H.M.D. & Liao, L.D. (2022). Emerging wearable
biosensor technologies for stress monitoring and their real-world applications. Biosensors 2022, 12(12), 1097.
https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6374/12/12/1097
Comments
Post a Comment